The settlement restructuring college athletics is already dealing with issues. Did the NCAA and power conferences get duped or build it to fail?

Schools are ready to embrace "normal" NIL: no pay-for-play deals. Even after the House settlement, challenges await.

College sports entered an entirely new, and entirely unprecedented, era on July 1 when the House v. NCAA settlement finally took effect. For the first time ever, schools can directly pay players for performance via revenue sharing contracts.

Less than two weeks after terms of a multibillion-dollar college sports settlement went into effect, friction erupted over the definition of a “valid business purpose” that collectives making name, image and likeness payments to players are supposed

The College Sports Commission is the new entity tasked with enforcing the details of the House settlement, which allows for schools to directly pay athletes.

And the fundamental truth every attempt to “fix” college sports runs up against is that its future can only go down one of two paths. The first: Congress will pass a law, and Trump will sign ...

College sports leaders are in active negotiations with plaintiff attorneys over, perhaps, the most significant piece of the House settlement: whether to permit traditional booster collective deals to athletes.

BYU athletic officials speak about both the financial state of BYU sports and the dawn of a new era in college sports business.