The Allahabad High Court addressed a writ petition filed by Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd. challenging the dismissal of their GST appeal by the Additional Commissioner, Grade – 2 (Appeal), State Tax, ...

Delhi High Court denies plea for waiver of mandatory pre-deposit under Section 107 (6) of CGST Act, citing binding precedents on appeal requirements.

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to quash the the impugned order dated 31.12.2024, passed in DIN and Notice No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1071710564 (1) and consequently, to direct the lifting of ...

68.3 Stamp vendors across the country, by virtue of performing an important public duty and receiving remuneration from the Government for the discharge of such duty, are undoubtedly public servants ...

This case involves appeals filed by Bharti Airtel Limited (as successor to Telenor India Communications Pvt. Ltd.) against ...

The CESTAT set aside the impugned order and directed the Commissioner of Customs to release the confiscated goods to Happy Gems within two weeks of the order. The appeal filed by the customs broker ...

Observations of the candidates on the question papers of CA Final, Intermediate Foundation and Post Qualification Course – ...

Despite the Supreme Court’s judgment, further litigation arose in the Orissa High Court regarding the imposition of interest for the period between the filing of returns and the Supreme Court’s ...

During the ITAT hearing, the assesses counsel argued that since the return filed on March 1, 2022, was accepted by the AO for computation purposes, the non-issuance of a notice under Section 143 (2) ...

These receipts, totaling over ₹28.63 crore, included payments for marketing contributions, Priority Club memberships, reservation services, and Holidex fees, relating to centralized services provided ...

The counsel for the petitioner relied on Rule 86A (3) of the CGST Rules, 2017, which explicitly states that such restrictions on the use of the amount available in the electronic credit ledger “shall ...

ITAT Ahmedabad held that section 275 (1A) of the Act empowers AO to impose or enhance or reduce or cancel penalty pursuant to the quantum appeal before higher appellate authority or court by giving ...